Three articles have caught my eye in the months since my first post about Greg Mortenson and the accusations of wrongdoing within his Central Asia Institute (CAI). Unsurprisingly, they drew my attention in part because they pick up on two main themes of my post: the difficulty of verifying development dollars on the ground (which works in Mortenson’s immediate defense) and the uneconomical/unsustainable nature of the CAI solution (a longer term but also more damning critique).
We’ll start with the good: a February report by 16 education aid agencies currently working in Afghanistan offers two vindications for the CAI, (the Guardian also provides a nice summary). The report and article both contribute an arbitrating neutrality, having been published before the CAI news broke. Two key points as they pertain to the Mortenson story:
First, the report points out the overall impressive gains in female education that have taken place in Afghanistan since 2001. On paper, $1.9 billion has been spent on education, 2,281 schools have been built, and female enrollment has jumped from 5,000 to 2.4 million.
Secondly, the report simultaneously draws attention to the fact that these gains are significantly inflated on paper. Potentially 22% of those new students are classified as “long-term absentees”. A shocking 47% of the 2,281 “schools built” have no physical building, and school closure due to insecurity remains a chronic problem.
For CAI, the first piece of news is certainly a positive indicator that their efforts have been having some effect – they have been part of that collective school building campaign. Let’s not forget we’re talking about one of the least developed countries in the world that is still battling some very repressive views towards female education. In such a context, those gains really are impressive, and CAI is part of that story.
The second vindication is more bittersweet in that it demonstrates that many of the 60 Minutes’ claims regarding the schools themselves – the claims that suggested far less on the ground success than CAI claims on paper – are in fact not at all unique to the CAI. Given those statistics above, in fact, CAI may be having far more than the average success in getting schools open in Afghanistan .